Obama, Pelosi, and Reid Got the Economic Stimulus Package Wrong

The $787 billion dollar economic stimulus package is nothing more that a big spending bill pasted together in a hurry without any real estimates of how many jobs will be saved or created. Nor does it address how those jobs will be sustained. Each line item in the package should have had an estimate of effect on jobs provided by experts in that area, a statement of how those jobs will generate growth in terms of GDP, and then the entire list prioritized. As is, it is a big picture with states and cities struggling for their piece of the pie.

And as for tax cuts. Not much there either for us low men/women on the totem pole. I'm really looking forward to my $15 to $20 more per month based on our family tax bracket. Wow, I can maybe I can take my wife to the movies.

It also looks like we are trying to fix a problem without trying to determine the root cause. How did all this happen? Was it greedy Wall Street with their outrageous bonus systems, greedy bankers who would broker mortgages with wild abandon, easy credit? Columbia professor David Beim says:

"The problem is us. The problem is not the banks, greedy though they may be, overpaid though they may be. The problem is us... We've been living very high on the hog. Our living standard has been rising dramatically in the last 25 years. And we have been borrowing much of the money to make that prosperity happen."

U.S. consumer debt rose sharply between 2000 and 2008. In 2007, it came to equal gross domestic product -- we owed as much as our entire economy was worth, roughly $13,000,000,000,000 (that's $13 Trillion). The last time that happened? 1929.

As I expected, the root cause of the economic problem is us, we have been living high off the hog. Exacerbated by corporate greed. Gordon Gekko, in the movie Wall Street (1987) said "Greed is Good". So the only real solution to the problem is to get the economic stimulus package to us. I suggest the Federal Government provide a tax free (i.e. federal, state, city) economic rescue package of $500,000 for each bonafide taxpayer with gross income less than $200,000, including those who do not pay tax because of their income level.

So what would be the result of giving $500K to each taxpayer?

For those who own a home and are facing foreclosure because they overbought or got into a bad mortgage they would have between $500K and $1M to pay off (or down) that debt. So why would they pay? Well the mortgage holder would be after them so fast they would have no choice.

But what about the folks who have no mortgage problem? Well they could keep all their money or pay off their mortgage as they chose. They would be rewarded by having more disposable money than those who overbought.

Credit card companies would be after those who had bad credit debt and force them to pay up, or else.

As for all those homes that banks own, well now would be the time for apartment dwellers and homeless folks to purchase the home to clear the debt from the banks.

As a result, banks would clear their toxic assets, either eliminating them all together or at least getting them to a manageable level. With the additional influx of cash they would now be able to start credit flowing to businesses.

With everyone now flush with money the demand for goods and services would go up. People would purchase cars and trucks with their excess cash or could now get reasonable credit. With the demand up we would not have to bail out Detroit, leaving them to sink or swim driven by the market forces (which we should do anyway).

Demand for other items would go up as well, How about that new 60 inch plasma TV, or the around-the-world trip, or you name it. With demand up so would the need for a workforce to fulfill the demand. Reasonable people, I believe, would keep on working, having experienced the worst financial disaster in their lifetime. They would see this as a once in a lifetime chance. They would realize that the money can go only so far and would need to keep working for their future financial security, health care, college tuition, unforeseen expenses, etc. Those that blow it by blowing the money well tough luck, find a nice homeless shelter.

To make sure we don't fall into the same situation as currently exists we will need stronger regulation of the financial industry, Wall Street, executive bonuses, etc.

So you get the gist, this would be a win-win situation between taxpayers earning under $200K per year, the government, the banks, and credit companies.

And as for those folks earning $200K or more, well screw them. They have been fat cats long enough and should know better how to manage finances.

A German’s Point of View on Islam

From a post on the Issues of Concern for Justice and Society (ISCJ) web site

by Paul E. Marek
Wednesday January 2, 2008
from (forwarder) Dr. Emanual Tanay

A man whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War ll owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.

'We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectra of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard quantifiable fact is that the 'peaceful majority', the 'silent majority', is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.The average Japanese individual prior to World War ll was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilian s; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet.And, who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghan is, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts: the fanatics who threaten our way of life.Lastly, at the risk of offending, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems of expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world wide, read this - think about it - and send it on.

Emanuel Tanay,
M.D. Ann Arbor, MI

And my own thoughts:

Remember:

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing

Have you ever noticed that in most all photos and videos of Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Queda, and other radical Islamists/terrorists, they are always wearing masks? Could it be that they are gutless cowards afraid to show their faces? As they walk into crowds and blow up innocent women, children and old men, as they launch rockets from hospitals and crowded schools, as they use their friends and neighbors an human shields is it any wonder that they want to cover their faces?

From Annual Jihad Report 2008
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Jihad Attacks: 2204 Countries: 41 Religions: 5 Dead bodies: 10779 Critically Injured: 18213